<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research</id>
  <title type="text">sci.math.research Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Discussion of current mathematical research. (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.math.research/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.math.research feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-09T18:12:37Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.gp" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike</name>
  <email>henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T18:12:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/8bca9e7956636d68?show_docid=8bca9e7956636d68</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/8bca9e7956636d68?show_docid=8bca9e7956636d68"/>
  <title type="text">Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Excellent news. Thanks much. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m having trouble following the proof, though. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll get back to it when I&#39;m not supposed to be working. &lt;br&gt; The crucial point that I didn&#39;t think of. &lt;br&gt; Once I can prove that both ends of the height-defining segment are in &lt;br&gt; n-cube, &lt;br&gt; the rest is easy.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Corbennick</name>
  <email>corbenn...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T18:12:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/7f38d70c7f23d13f?show_docid=7f38d70c7f23d13f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/7f38d70c7f23d13f?show_docid=7f38d70c7f23d13f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Do free abelian groups embed into connected semisimple complex lie groups?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Any such Lie group contains a complex torus isomorphic to C^*. &lt;br&gt; This group contains a subgroup isomorphic to the additive group R &lt;br&gt; of reals. Now let n be a natural number and choose v_1,...,v_n in R &lt;br&gt; which are linearly independent over Q. &lt;br&gt; Then the group Z v_1 + ... + Z v_n is free abelian of rank n and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Corbennick</name>
  <email>corbenn...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T16:26:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/6780bad50ad65781?show_docid=6780bad50ad65781</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/6780bad50ad65781?show_docid=6780bad50ad65781"/>
  <title type="text">Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The lower bound is 1/sqrt(n). &lt;br&gt; Proof as follows. Let e_1,...,e_n be the standard basis of R^n. &lt;br&gt; Let s be a simplex of dimension n in R^n. &lt;br&gt; The minimal height is taken at a vertex v_1 which lies opposite to a &lt;br&gt; face F of maximal area. &lt;br&gt; (This is so since the volume of the simplex is height times area(F) &lt;br&gt; times dimension factor.)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike</name>
  <email>henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-08T00:16:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/c49e498129250317?show_docid=c49e498129250317</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/c49e498129250317?show_docid=c49e498129250317"/>
  <title type="text">minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  What is the minimum height of a full dimensional n-simplex whose &lt;br&gt; vertices are members {0, 1}**n ? &lt;br&gt; Equivalently, what is the minimum non-zero distance to the origin from &lt;br&gt; a hyperplane defined by members of {0, 1}**n ? &lt;br&gt; The answer is at most 1/sqrt(n) . &lt;br&gt; The corner simplex provides an example. &lt;br&gt; A smaller answer might be possible if the simplex is oblique enough
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>mahdiarnt</name>
  <email>mahdia...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-06T19:04:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/b96c55f9f2cc7f74?show_docid=b96c55f9f2cc7f74</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/b96c55f9f2cc7f74?show_docid=b96c55f9f2cc7f74"/>
  <title type="text">Re: delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Oh now I see. Thanks G.A and Dan for pointing out the caveat in my &lt;br&gt; argument.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Geometry and Topology</name>
  <email>g...@msp.warwick.ac.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-04T12:35:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/89eddf5417d13aa8/816040dfcacf67dd?show_docid=816040dfcacf67dd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/89eddf5417d13aa8/816040dfcacf67dd?show_docid=816040dfcacf67dd"/>
  <title type="text">Ten papers published by GT Publications</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Five papers have been published by Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology &lt;br&gt; (1) Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology 10 (2010) 315-342 &lt;br&gt; An involution on the K-theory of bimonoidal categories with anti-involution &lt;br&gt; by Birgit Richter &lt;br&gt; URL: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2010/10-01/p010.xhtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.315
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>editor ijcs</name>
  <email>ijcsorgedi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-04T17:28:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/47cd9e203d9ca058/ead85a4b5603f978?show_docid=ead85a4b5603f978</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/47cd9e203d9ca058/ead85a4b5603f978?show_docid=ead85a4b5603f978"/>
  <title type="text">Call for Paper The International Journal of Computer Science (IJCS)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Call for Paper &lt;br&gt; The International Journal of Computer Science (IJCS) publishes &lt;br&gt; original papers on all subjects relevant to computer science, &lt;br&gt; communication network, and information systems. The highest priority &lt;br&gt; will be given to those contributions concerned with a discussion of &lt;br&gt; the background of a practical problem, the establishment of an
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dan Luecking</name>
  <email>lookin...@uark.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T21:59:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/6182575e7b9ea879?show_docid=6182575e7b9ea879</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/6182575e7b9ea879?show_docid=6182575e7b9ea879"/>
  <title type="text">Re: delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:40:02 -0600, Dan Luecking &amp;lt;LookIn...@uark.edu&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I really meant n,m&amp;gt;0 &lt;br&gt; and I meant \sum_{k &amp;lt;= n, j &amp;lt;= m} &lt;br&gt; And here || f ||_{n,m} &lt;br&gt; And here || f ||_{0,0} &lt;br&gt; Dan &lt;br&gt; To reply by email, change LookInSig to luecking
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dan Luecking</name>
  <email>lookin...@uark.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T19:40:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/2d175831007192d6?show_docid=2d175831007192d6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/2d175831007192d6?show_docid=2d175831007192d6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:12:35 -0800 (PST), mahdiarnt &lt;br&gt; You have provided a proof that the delta function &lt;br&gt; is not continuous on L^2. To prove it _is_ continuous &lt;br&gt; on S, you have to use the topology on S, which is &lt;br&gt; provided by the fammily of seminorms || f ||_{n,m}, &lt;br&gt; n &amp;gt;= 0, where || f ||_{n,m} is defined to be
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>G. A. Edgar</name>
  <email>ed...@math.ohio-state.edu.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T16:23:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/2f9128fb48dca59a?show_docid=2f9128fb48dca59a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/2f9128fb48dca59a?show_docid=2f9128fb48dca59a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;5b79b21d-efa8-4f42-979b-f3518 b89c...@g8g2000pri.googlegroup s.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; So, you refer to ||f||_S , but what is that? Of course, to determine &lt;br&gt; whether some function is continuous on S we need to know what is the &lt;br&gt; topology on S. In fact, this topology is not given by a norm.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Geometry and Topology Journal</name>
  <email>g...@msp.warwick.ac.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T12:52:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/55aba1dbaf7c242b/eaad55358bc401bb?show_docid=eaad55358bc401bb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/55aba1dbaf7c242b/eaad55358bc401bb?show_docid=eaad55358bc401bb"/>
  <title type="text">Ten papers published by GT Publications</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Five papers have been published by Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology &lt;br&gt; (1) Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology 10 (2010) 315-342 &lt;br&gt; An involution on the K-theory of bimonoidal categories with anti-involution &lt;br&gt; by Birgit Richter &lt;br&gt; URL: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2010/10-01/p010.xhtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.315
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>mahdiarnt</name>
  <email>mahdia...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T06:12:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/26c81b2743016f2e?show_docid=26c81b2743016f2e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/26c81b2743016f2e?show_docid=26c81b2743016f2e"/>
  <title type="text">delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve come across a claim that has made me confused. In &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907069&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; (which is for people like me) &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s claimed on page 17 that the delta function defined on functions &lt;br&gt; of Schwartz space S as &lt;br&gt; delta: S -&amp;gt; R, delta_{x_0} f = f(x_0) &lt;br&gt; is continuous. I think it&#39;s true, as implicitly mentioned there as
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>mark zorro</name>
  <email>markzorr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T11:19:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/c3cf901c83976a19?show_docid=c3cf901c83976a19</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/c3cf901c83976a19?show_docid=c3cf901c83976a19"/>
  <title type="text">Do free abelian groups embed into connected semisimple complex lie groups?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Question: &lt;br&gt; Let A be a connected semisimiple complex lie group. Is it true that &lt;br&gt; any free abelian group G of finite rank can be embedded in A? &lt;br&gt; I know that it is the case that any free groups of finite rank can be &lt;br&gt; embedded into any connected complex semisimple lie group. &lt;br&gt; Do we have to make any assumptions about the dimension of A for the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>org ijsp</name>
  <email>ijsp...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-03T04:59:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c146fd67f5a7d2ff/0a93500151edce9e?show_docid=0a93500151edce9e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c146fd67f5a7d2ff/0a93500151edce9e?show_docid=0a93500151edce9e"/>
  <title type="text">Call For Manuscripts: International Journal of Signal Processing (IJSP)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Call For Manuscripts &lt;br&gt; The International Journal of Signal Processing (IJSP) is currently &lt;br&gt; accepting original high-quality research manuscripts for publication. &lt;br&gt; The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the &lt;br&gt; scientific criteria of significance and academic excellence. All &lt;br&gt; research articles submitted for the journal will be peer-reviewed
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>IanCalvert</name>
  <email>ical12...@btinternet.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-02T13:31:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/930d1ecfa65ec52f/b1fc5e718b1adcf0?show_docid=b1fc5e718b1adcf0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.gp/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/930d1ecfa65ec52f/b1fc5e718b1adcf0?show_docid=b1fc5e718b1adcf0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Three Elementary Planar Convexity Problems</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  D&#39;oh! and sincere regrets at errors due to haste in posting. &lt;br&gt; Long and thin rectangles show that both (i) and (ii) are incorrect. &lt;br&gt; Although it is possible to avoid that case by restricting the minimal &lt;br&gt; width of X it is probably best to consider case (iii) only.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
